<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Linda Elliott</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrew Borden</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Intuition and Decision-making Systems (II)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp;Security : An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">50-54.</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A canonical design method was applied to the task of building a system to classify airborne targets according to their threat status and the appropriate response from an Integrated Air Defense System. The nature of the data base made the classification task (understandably) difficult. However, partial disclosure of the deterministic algorithm used to classify targets made the classification task even more difficult, contrary to intuition. The inadequacy of intuition is a compelling reason for using canonical methods to design for decision making systems.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Intuition and Decision-making Systems (II)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">50-54</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article discusses how a canonical design method was used to build a system to classify airborne targets according to their threat status, and to specify the appropriate response from an integrated air defense system. The paper argues that the inadequacy of human intuition is a strong reason to use canonical methods for designing decision making systems.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>