<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thomas Benesch</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johannes Goellner</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andreas Peer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johann Hoechtl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Walter Seboeck</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scenario Space for Alternative Futures of Security Research</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comprehensive approach</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EUCIP</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">European Critical Infrastructure Protection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOCUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Generalised Security Research System</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Incident Management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nationalisation of Security Research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Health Research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scenario Space</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Security Economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Security Research 2035</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">111-119</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOCUS (“Foresight Security Scenarios – Mapping Research to a Comprehensive Approach to Exogenous EU Roles”) aims namely to define the most plausible threat scenarios that affect the “borderline” between the EU’s external and internal dimensions to security. This article presents scenarios about alternative futures of security research to support a comprehensive approach of the “EU 2035” as a civil security provider. Three scenarios were selected as context scenarios for alternative futures of security research afterwards they have been lined up with drivers identified in a matrix procedure. From these three context scenarios six alternative futures for security research were evaluated using the portfolio-cluster-method. The weighting was done from a dual and interdependent perspective: a) nation/ member state vs. EU-level/international approach to civil security and b) position of the scenario on the continuum of internal/external security. Finally, the article introduces each scenario for alternative future of security research in detail.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">111</style></section></record></records></xml>