<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shannon Foley</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caitlin Jackson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susan Aros</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anne Marie Baylouny</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NATO and Intermediate Force Capabilities: Why Human Effects Matter</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Connections: The Quarterly Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agent-based</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">gray zone</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intermediate force capabilities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">non-lethal weapons</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">security forces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">123-134</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">On February 24, 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, the international order changed as sharply and abruptly as it did on the morning of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) invoked Article V for the first time in NATO’s history. As a result of Russia’s invasion, NATO’s demand for deterrence capabilities—with the hope that Article V is never again necessary to exercise—is more urgent now than at any time in the 21st century. Because lethality is absolutely necessary but not sufficient, NATO must develop and maintain capabilities that complement lethal force with intermediate force options to complete the deterrence equation across the entire competition continuum.
   Intermediate Force Capabilities (IFCs) can deliver immediate value to NATO countries, providing leaders and policymakers with Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) options that can deter enemy actions, as necessary, below the level of lethal combat operations. IFCs, a term introduced into the U.S. Department of Defense in 2020 to define capabilities that bridge the gap between presence and lethal effects, encompass NLWs as well as other additional capabilities and technologies that have utility below the level of armed conflict.
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">123</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Velizar Shalamanov</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georgi Penchev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Methodology for Organizational Design of Cyber Research Networks</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIGILIENCE 2019</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyber security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enterprise Architecture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">governance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">network analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2-4 October</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sofia, Bulgaria</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The paper presents possible approaches for building a new network organization in the area of cybersecurity. The study is focused on selection of activities, processes and structures needed for the network governance and management. The study considers links between Enterprise Architecture approach, COBIT framework and network analysis with the task to elaborate a standard and comprehensive framework for analysis of IT related areas of organizational governance and management. Examples of NATO and EU initiatives for network organization design and implementation are explored with specific focus on ECHO project. Accreditation procedure based on participant&amp;rsquo;s self-assessment is presented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper is included in the program of &lt;a href=&quot;https://digilience.org&quot;&gt;DIGILIENCE 2019&lt;/a&gt; and will be published in the post-conference volume.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yoana Ivanova</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Policies for the Protection of Critical Infrastructure from Cyber Attacks</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT4Sec Reports</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberattack</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risk</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">threat</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">US</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December 2014</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">116</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institute of Information and Communication Technologies</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sofia</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this paper is addressed in details the policy of the US regarding the issues of cyber security that are contained in Presidential Policy Directive (PPD-21). The tasks that should be solved for evaluation and planning of critical infrastructure protection are clearly defined. The following are specific examples of approaches and means to protect critical infrastructure from cyber attacks.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eugene Nickolov</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contemporary Trends in the Development of Information Security and Computer Virology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal </style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biometric</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Computer Virology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dynamic Programming</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information Security</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mobile Communications</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Satellite Communications</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Steganometric.</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">60-72</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article presents an analysis of the latest trends in information security and computer virology. The basic components of the information security are introduced, including data security, computer security, communication security, network security, mobile security, manipulations security, biometric security, and steganometric security. The main factors exerting influence on these components, as well as their relationships are shown. A formal record for the information security as a function of specific arguments is developed. The fundamental procedures of the information security are represented, including Monitoring, Blocking, Removing, Protection and Verification. 
The analysis continues with the computer virology topic. In the beginning, the fundamental work principles of the computer viruses are examined: Reproduction, Transportation, Malicious Thinking and Good-natured Thinking. Then the main steps in the computer viruses investigation are analyzed: Isolation, Decomposition, Formal Description, Modeling, Decision-making and Program Realization. Next, methods for computer viruses detection are examined, such as Signature analysis, Integrity Check, Monitoring and Restriction. After that the basic steps during the computer viruses removal as Localization, Identification, Removing, Deactivation and Verification are shown. 
In the conclusion, the role and the importance of the information security and the computer virology for the development of the contemporary society in conditions of growing communication mobility and globality are pointed out.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Valentine Penev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fuzzy Controller for Antitank Wire Guided Missile Simulator  with Direct X SDK</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal </style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3D simulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">aerodynamic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fin mixer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fuzzy control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">missile</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">modeling</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">79-90</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper examines the main steps in the process of creating an antitank wire guided missile simulator. This principal task includes the following items: understanding the behavior of the simulated object, appropriate mathematical modeling and 3-dimensial visualization. The general features of a fuzzy controlled semi-automatic missile are studied and missile response against the mobile target is evaluated and discussed. The main characteristics of simulator for antitank wire guided missile designed with DirectX7 SDK are presented.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>