<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Todor Tagarev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">George Sharkov</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multi-stakeholder Approach to Cybersecurity and Resilience</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaborative networks</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyber maturity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity strategy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intelligent complex adaptive system</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multi-stakeholder approach</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizational framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizational model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">public-private partnership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stovepipes</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">59-68</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Identifying and involving all relevant stakeholders in national cybersecurity strategy (NCSS) development is key for defining the scope, setting the goals and approaches, and the roadmap to achieve targeted maturity levels. It is more than involving the three groups (government, private sector, academia) and requires a holistic approach towards security and resilience of all interconnected segments of national and international cyberspace. The paper presents the approach to making the Bulgarian NCSS (BG-NCSS). Different aspects of stakeholders' involvement and engagements are considered: for identifying the scope and developing the strategy, defining the responsibilities and engaging with the development of a national collaboration operational network, strategy implementation and the roadmap to a resilient society, and collaboration to achieve operational cyber resiliency. As a collaboration mechanism, applications of public-private partnerships at different levels are envisaged.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">59</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georgi Tsvetkov</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Military-Industrial Complex: How to profit from the National Security</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CSDM Views</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulgaria</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense acquisition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense industrial policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense politics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">defense procurement policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">military-industrial complex</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">public-private partnership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">small state</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33</style></number><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The meaning of “Military-industrial complex” in the former “Eastern bloc” European countries is different from that of the famous farewell speech of the US President D.D. Eisenhower . The VPK (Military-industrial complex) consists of the state owned military industry during the Soviet era. Few of these enterprises survived the end of the Cold war, especially those in the new NATO and EU member states. Almost all “successful stories” are about private or joint public private companies.
Bulgaria should change its understanding of Military-industrial complex from this of the Soviet era VPK to that of Eisenhower speech. The idea is not to „avoid” the democratic institutions, but to establish mutually benefit relations between the Government (MoD) and the private business from the perspective of a small country with still developing heavy industry.
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>