<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vlad Posea</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">George Sharkov</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adrian Baumann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georgios Chatzichristos</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Towards Unified European Cyber Incident and Crisis Management Ontology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crisis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity Act</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cybersecurity taxonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">harm</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incident response</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Interoperability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ontology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risk Assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">threat</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-44</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENISA highlighted the need for a common reporting taxonomy for cybersecurity incidents to be used by cybersecurity analysts across Europe. The analysis of the domain revealed a large number of taxonomies for different areas of the cybersecurity domain (types of attacks, vulnerabilities, sectors, harm), but those needed to be linked together in a model that allows a cybersecurity officer to report and track an incident fast and accurately. The taxonomy should also treat the cybersecurity domain not only from the technical point of view but also from the socio-economical aspect. This document describes the taxonomy, how we propose to use it, and the methodology used to develop it.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raymond Collier</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Obama Administration and Incident Response: A Report</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information &amp; Security: An International Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barack Obama</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cybersecurity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incident response</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">law</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">legislature</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NCIRP</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Obama Administration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">proposals</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">105-120</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article takes an in-depth look at the Obama Administration’s incident response plan and its utilization in regard to cyber security throughout their Presidential and Executive-Administrative terms. A focal point and outlining the tool used in the report is the National Cyber Incident Response Plan (Interim Version), released in September 2010 by the Department of Homeland Security. Contents of the response plan are analyzed through brief descriptions, government reports, supportive literature, and comparison of actual efforts conducted by the Administration that reflect sections of the plan. A brief review of legislature that could directly affect the process, assurance, or future of incident response and cyber security proposed by the Administration is included. Discussion of the current presiding President, Barack Obama, and his mannerisms in the wake of incidents, thoughts and views on the nature of the subject, actions planned as well as taken to secure the United States’ technological realm, that is the internet, from digital terrorism are micro-scoped and provide a real-time wealth of how incident response is being handled in the U.S.; the past struggles appertained and a glimpse into its architectural future. The report collectively parallels the Administration’s formulated incident response plan with their actual actions on real-life incidents in an attempt to provide present-day documentation of resolutions pertaining to incidents and cyber security in the U.S.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">105</style></section></record></records></xml>